Saturday, July 23, 2011

An Evening of Grounded Theoyr: Teachine Process through Demonstration and Simulation by Frances Huehls

An Evening of Grounded Theory: Teaching Process through Demonstration and Simulation

Frances Huehls

Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana

Grounded theory can be effectively introduced in a survey course through a combination of lecture/demonstration and simulation. The class session presented here illustrates a way to introduce graduate students to the process of grounded theory and gain hands-on experience through simulation. The lesson utilizes concepts that the students are familiar with, allowing them to focus on the research process, and encourages internalization of concepts through immediate application. Key Words: Constant Comparative Method, Grounded Theory, Philanthropy, Qualitative Inquiry, and Simulation

Introduction

Grounded theory may be particularly difficult for beginning student researchers to grasp because the process reverses the order of empirical research—hypothesis generation followed by data collection. The idea that theories can be generated from data—let alone qualitative data—contradicts the scientific tradition they were taught in elementary school science. Students of social problems deal with complex issues that can be analyzed in all of their dimensions by methods of inquiry such as grounded theory, which rely on more than analysis of quantifiable data. This is beautifully illustrated by the grounded theory approach used by Harry, Sturges, and Klingner (2005) in their research of minority student representation in special education.

I teach qualitative research methods within the field of philanthropic studies, a cross-disciplinary area of study that addresses charitable giving, volunteering, and nonprofit/nongovernmental/charitable organizations. Our students can pursue a Master of Arts degree, which examines philanthropy from religious, philosophical, economic, social, historical, and legal viewpoints or can choose a course of study for a master’s in public administration focused on management of nonprofit organizations. Both groups are welcome to enroll in the course. Since this is a survey course in qualitative inquiry for master’s level students, the amount of time that can be devoted to any particular method is limited. Unless students decide to use grounded theory for their individual research projects, this class session is their only exposure beyond text reading.

My purpose is to present the reader with a detailed description of my evening-long class session on grounded theory in the hope that some or all of what is presented can be used to teach a similar class. I begin with a statement of learning objectives, a brief summary of the session, and a discussion of pedagogical issues. This is followed by detailed narratives describing the lecture/demonstration and simulation components of the class session. Finally, reflective observations, including limitations of the session and modifications that may be necessary to ensure continued effectiveness are made.

329 The Qualitative Report June 2005
Instructors who are teaching grounded theory at an advanced level or in a course dedicated solely to that methodology will find this approach too elementary for their needs. It will be most useful for survey courses and instructors seeking an introductory approach.

The learning objectives for my students are to apply the approach presented in their text, Colin Robson’s
Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers (2002) in order to:

• Identify categories within a set of data
• Find relationships within these categories
• Identify core concepts that describe these relationships
In addition, I want them to be able to recognize the use of grounded theory when they encounter it in published research.

The most recent iteration of this lesson was given in two parts: a lecture/demonstration to introduce the students to the process of grounded theory, followed by a hands-on simulation exercise that allowed them to work through the mechanics of the process. Since our class met for 150 minutes during the evening, variety in presentation and hands-on involvement helped keep everyone alert and involved. Prior to class, the students were assigned reading from our main text, Colin Robson’s Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers (2002).

In line with good teaching practice, the lesson presented was both learning-centered and mindful of individual learning styles. Although student participation may be minimal, lecture presentations are appropriate when the goal is to provide an overview of a process or topic (Saroyan & Amundsen, 2004). The interaction of the simulation that followed the lecture served multiple purposes. Feedback during the simulation informed me of how well the students understood what was presented in the lecture. The interaction of the simulation exercise also affirmed to the individual students that they understood the material presented and its relevance to their course of study. Simulation entails decision-making that encourages cognitively complex thinking (McCombs & Whisler, 1997; Saroyan & Amundsen). The combination of lecture, which presents abstract concepts illustrated with concrete examples, and simulation, which is both active and reflective, provides both comfort and challenges across learning styles (Little, 2004; Mainemelis, Boyatzis, & Kolb, 2002; Terry, 2001).

Lecture/Demonstration

The lecture began by reviewing existing definitions of philanthropic studies, with a focus on broad versus narrow meaning. The students were already familiar with these definitions including "study of voluntary action for the public good" (Payton, 1988b) and "study of voluntary giving for public purposes" (Payton, 1988a), which are deliberately broad and inclusive. As the person responsible for developing a library research collection for philanthropic studies, I had struggled to find a definition with boundaries to exclude some literature but detailed enough to enable intelligent choices. To synthesize an operational definition that would facilitate book selections, I decided to develop a theory of philanthropic studies that was grounded in the literature itself. I pointed out to
Frances Huehls 330
the students that it was not feasible to examine a huge body of literature such as the collection of the Library of Congress to find the part that represented the field of philanthropic studies. Because of that limitation, I decided to "interview" the Library of Congress subject headings: the thesaurus used to describe the content of books published in the English language. This five-volume thesaurus was shared around the seminar table to demonstrate the enormity of the data pool of possible subject descriptors.

I reminded the class that I was able to approach this task intelligently because I have more than a decade of experience with literature in the field. Grounded theory is based on the notion that the researcher is informed and ready to make decisions about individual pieces of data—to recognize the "plausible relationships proposed among concepts and sets of concepts" (Strauss & Corbin, 1994, p. 278). In my case, this meant going through the five volumes of subject headings and testing each subject heading with a yes/no decision: yes, the subject was related to philanthropic studies or no, there was no relationship. For example, the following table replicates the contents of a page of subject headings and the decision made about each entry (Table 1).

Table 1


Sample of Library of Congress Subject Headings
Benefit of inventory
NO


Benefit performances

YES


Benefit Street (Worcester, Mass.)

NO


Benelux countries

NO


Benet-Mercle machine gun

NO


Beneticos Range (Spain)

NO


Beneux family

NO


Benevento (Italy)

NO


Benevolence

YES


Benevolence in literature

YES


Benfield family

NO


Beng (African people)

NO


Beng language

NO
















Ads

Online Degree Programs
AA, BA, BS, MA, MS, & PhD Degrees Search 1000+ Accredited Programs
www.DegreeSearch.org
Become a Teacher
Be The Inspiration for Change. M.A. in Education in 1 Yr. Apply Today!
gsep.Pepperdine.edu
Electrician Degree
Earn your Electrician Degree from an Accredited School.
EverestCollege.edu
Online Teaching Degrees
Earn a degree online to start your Teaching career—Get info now!
waldenuniversitynow.com
M.Ed. Online in 16 Months
Earn a Master's Degree in Education Online from WNE. Learn More Today!
Mastersineducation.wne.edu
Master's in Teaching
Curriculum & Instruction Masters at ACU. Fully Accredited. 100% Online.
ACUOnline.ACU.Edu
Want to Join The FBI ?
See If You Have What it Takes Try This Free Practice Entry Exam.
funnelbrain.com/criminal-justice

More about...
Research »

Students Education »

Teaching Masters »

School Students »

About these links












Archive



Spam



Delete















Move to Inbox



Labels





More



14 of 70

















©2011 Google - Terms & Privacy

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Some ideas...leading to Humanism in Distance Education

Basically, phenomenology studies the structure of various types of experience ranging from perception, thought, memory, imagination, emotion, desire, and volition to bodily awareness, embodied action, and social activity, including linguistic activity. The structure of these forms of experience typically involves what Husserl called “intentionality”, that is, the directedness of experience toward things in the world, the property of consciousness that it is a consciousness of or about something. According to classical Husserlian phenomenology, our experience is directed toward — represents or “intends” — things only through particular concepts, thoughts, ideas, images, etc. These make up the meaning or content of a given experience, and are distinct from the things they present or mean.[From: Stanford Encyclopedia]
This portion is by design related to the Dissertation at Fielding Graduate University/ Margith A Strand

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Margith Strand/November 20, 2010/Fielding Graduate University

There are four stages of analyses to the Grounded Theory methodology (Wikipedia); one of them is "codes." I will be applying a concept in analysis which I will term "code mobility;" this is a concept which  assists in transcending time, place and space parameters of a sociological setting.

StagePurpose
CodesIdentifying anchors that allow the key points of the data to be gathered
ConceptsCollections of codes of similar content that allows the data to be grouped
CategoriesBroad groups of similar concepts that are used to generate a theory
TheoryA collection of explanations that explain the subject of the research

[This is a term which was originally referred by "Polo" Chen in his Dissertation at Ohio University]

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Systems Analysis Relational Themes/ Margith Strand

Tuesday, July 20, 2010TIme/ Distance Education/ Margith A. Strand/July 20, 2010/ Fielding Graduate University

"A Transcendental determination of time is so far homogeneous with the category, which constitutes the unity thereof, that it is universal, and rests upon a rule a priori. On the other hand, it is so far homogeneous with the phenomenon, inasmuch as time is contained in every empirical representation of the manifold." Immanuel Kant

"Time is contained as a system in Distance Learning." Margith A. Strand "Space is a determination, a whatness, a content, of an abstract something in which all the objects of our experience participate" I. Kant; "....inasmuch as time is contained in every empirical representation of the manifold." Kant

Time is captured in the words, and yet, the words are an experiential and empirical representation of action...social justice as discourse. Margith A. Strand



2010 (94)
Constant Comparison Method: Jane F. Dye, Irene M. ...
Project Report by Maggie Lynch
Psychotextual Notations of Constructivistic Distan...
Humanistic Education/ Wikipedia/ November 8, 2010

AST/ Margith A. Strand/ October 29, 2010

Systems Analysis
Historical Perspective/ Discourse Analysis
Margith Strand
Hello Again!

Humanism for me and you:) By Margith A. Strand Fie...
Means-End Analysis/
Balance Scale /Cognitive Application to Distance E...
Problem Space/Thought Processes/ Basics/July 22, 2...
Means-Ends Analysis: Wikipedia/ July 22, 2010
Margith A. Strand/ July 22, 2010
Philosophy/ Distance Education/ Margith A. Strand
Distance Education/ Humanism Attributes/ By Margit...
Affective Domain and Attitudes/ Causation/Distance...
Human Agency and Distance Learning/Distance Educat...
Act and Potentiality/Cause and Space/ and time/ Ma...
Margith A. Strand/
TIme/ Distance Education/ Margith A. Strand/July 2...
Distance Education/ Margith A. Strand
Word, Knowledge and Truth/Jacques Maritain/ July 2...
Margith A. Strand/ Semiotics Classical/ Distance E...
Globality-Specificity/ By Margith A. Strand
Higher Educationist/ Margith A. Strand/
Philosophy of Mind and Construct of Learning/ Marg...
Distance Education:My Response to Humanistic Educa...
Humanism and Distance Education/Margith A. Strand/...
Maslow and Rogers/ Learning/ Distance Education/ W...
Meta Cognition [from ealier post] July 13, 2010
Theory Y: Distance Learning
Meta Learning July 2, 2010

AST Comments/ Margith A. Strand/ Online Education
AST Diagram from DeSanctis and Poole's Article/ Or...
New Approach for online educational format work of...
Basis of My inquiries [in part] in Online Educatio...
Margith A. Strand / More Information
Margith Strand/ Discourse intent/ Imaginal Context...
Information/ Margith A. Strand/ June 8, 2010

Study/Future Margith A. Strand/ May 29, 2010
F(x) = y / Domain and Range and Context Funct...
My Comment on Function Derivatives : Semiotics- Ma...
Semiotic History/ Function/ May 29, 2010/ Pictoria...
Contextual Derivation Analysis Chart for Sentence/...
Contextual Thematic Diagram for Semiotic Derivatio...
Recontextualisation_ by Gunilla Jansson
Cultural Context: Eli Gottlieb
Excerpts from Social Semiotics / Lilie Chouliaraki...

Situational Analysis by Adele E. Clarke